Do you see similarity in Chavez's expropriation of property and Cameron's privatization of the NHS?
I was just wondering if anyone sees any similarity between the "socialist" expropriation and the capitalist privatization.
Chavez points to a building, maybe a business that someone owns, where people are employed, and he says "expropriated". The employees must immediately leave the premises jobless. The building is now property of the state.
Cameron (UK Prime Minister) points to the NHS (National Health Service) and other public services which have been built and funded by the taxpayer for over 60 years, and he says "privitize". No doubt many will lose their jobs and it will become a business that only cares about profits. The changes will benefit the lobbyists that funded his campaign and his other capitalist friends at the expense of the public.